Better, stronger, faster: Object-centric process mining lets us rebuild business processes like The Six Million Dollar Man

https://delivery-p141552-e1488202.adobeaemcloud.com/adobe/assets/urn:aaid:aem:c1c0190d-6c71-49b9-8aaa-bcee2d8cb55c/as/Industry-Blog_Hero_2560x1440-High-Tech.jpg

“Steve Austin, astronaut. A man barely alive. Gentlemen, we can rebuild him: we have the technology. We have the capability to make the world’s first bionic man…Better than he was before. Better, stronger, faster.”

I am dating myself with a quote from “The Six Million Dollar Man,” a TV series from the 1970s. But, there’s a parallel between this sci-fi action series and business processes.

The Six Million Dollar Man chronicles the adventures of Colonel Steve Austin, played by Lee Majors. Austin was an astronaut, mortally wounded, rebuilt with bionics and deployed as a secret agent for the government.

Like Steve Austin, many business processes are wounded and in need of serious repair. In our time of hyper competitive markets, increasing complexity and economic volatility, inefficiencies fester across end to end processes due to the misalignment of people and technology silos. As such, many businesses struggle to move the needle on key customer, profit, and sustainability metrics.

It wasn’t long after The Six Million Dollar Man aired that some smart thinkers believed, like the surgeons rebuilding Steve Austin, that business processes could be rebuilt to be highly efficient and more powerful.

This idea is called Business Process Orientation (BPO) and it is a management philosophy that seeks to understand and structure organizations as a collection of processes that exist to create value for customers. BPO aspires to align organizational processes with the needs and expectations of customers. In a process-oriented organization, everyone thinks horizontally across functional silos and is responsible for improving processes, not just the process owners or an improvement team.

Business Process Orientation: An idea ahead of its time with great intentions

BPO emphasizes continuous improvement and innovation and promises to help organizations become more agile, efficient and effective. A study in 2000 showed that BPO is critical in helping companies reduce conflict, improve connectedness within the organization and improve business performance.

BPO is largely a response to the many end-to-end process challenges that hierarchical business silos create. Rigid management structures within silos of work lead to cross-process misalignment and a lack of performance. The result is often a severe disconnect between how a company operates and how its customers experience them (Figure 1). The cost of the resulting inefficiencies is astronomical in time wasted alone, but it also manifests as poor employee experience and negative customer satisfaction due to the breakdown at the hand off points between processes. This all impacts the top, bottom, and green lines of business.

https://delivery-p141552-e1488202.adobeaemcloud.com/adobe/assets/urn:aaid:aem:ba77fb0f-8900-4aea-8d35-aadf22f9def5/as/ocpm_credit_journey_siloed_business_banking.png

Figure 1: The disconnect between a customer’s credit application journey and the bank’s siloed business processes

BPO is an idea with great intentions, but was ahead of its time. In practice, many companies failed to realize success (some did, but with great effort). The projects were simply too big and complex to drive as BPO espoused a horizontal management structure for each end-to-end process. This often created obscurity in reporting lines and power dynamics across functional areas that were challenging to manage. The verdict is that trading hierarchical management silos for horizontal process silos can create blurry matrixial models.

This was also the era of Business Process Management (BPM). If BPO is the philosophy, BPM is the discipline of discovering, modeling, analyzing, measuring, improving, optimizing and automating business processes. Back then, however, process discovery was performed through time-consuming workshops that sought to understand processes from the input of employees. This resulted in process maps that were highly subjective and based on simplistic assumptions about what was really happening within a company’s processes.

The reality was often quite different. The process maps were an initial point-in-time reference and then seldom used. There was also a heavy focus on workflow management, but implementations often failed to deliver because they were based on assumptions from the workshops. At the time, the aspiration of BPO and BPM was sound, but the key technology to make it practical and successful did not yet exist.